additions to digital
All checks were successful
/ test (push) Successful in 51s

This commit is contained in:
djahnie 2024-02-20 21:32:36 +01:00
parent 68cbbc3bcf
commit 39fec18c27
6 changed files with 61 additions and 11 deletions

View file

@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
* [Nextcloud](digital/nextcloud.md)
* [Calendar](digital/calendar.md)
* [Slack](digital/slack.md)
* [Task Lottery](digital/tasklottery.md)
* [Ukuvota](digital/ukuvota.md)
### Rooms

View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ We host our own (CalDAV) calendar on our Nextcloud instance: https://cloud.kanth
- **festivals-events-etc** - for external events that may be of interest to others
- **Contact birthdays** - automagically generated from birthdates in the 'khontacts' contact book
See [trichter.cc](https://trichter.cc/) and [planlos-leipzig.org](https://www.planlos-leipzig.org/) for interesting events in Leipzig.
See [planlos-leipzig.org](https://www.planlos-leipzig.org/) for interesting events in Leipzig.
## Android/AOSP phone access
- Download [Davx5](https://www.davx5.com/)

21
digital/tasklottery.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# :ticket: Task Lottery
A small online tool for task distribution.
## Access
- to the [tool](https://kanthaus.gitlab.io/task-lottery/)
- to the [code](https://gitlab.com/kanthaus/task-lottery)
## Features
- Tasks that contain slots can be created. Every task can have a name and multiple slots.
- Participants with names can be created.
- A button starts the random distribution of participants to tasks.
- A signature melody plays during the assignment process.
## Usage
During [CoMe](/social/come.md) we use the task lottery to distribute dinner shifts and the opening of the free shop. In times of house fullness we might add lunch to the lottery.
Thanks to [Maxime's](https://maxlath.eu) custom coding the sections of the [CoMe pad](https://codi.kanthaus.online/come) in which people specify their unavailabilities or volunteer for a certain shift, are automatically imported.

23
digital/ukuvota.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# :dart: Ukuvota
Our small and simple score voting tool.
## Access
- to the [tool](https://legacy.ukuvota.world/#/)
- to the [code](https://gitlab.com/yunity/ukuvota)
## Features
- Create score votings in the range of -3 to +3 with public link.
- Specify the times for proposal and voting phase.
- Specify an additional weight for negative scores.
- Fully transparent results view.
## Usage
We use ukuvota for all important decision-making:
- Constitutional changes
- Changes to the Collective Agreements
- any questions with sufficiently high complexity and/or weight
In the past it was also used in more fun ways, like collect proposals for naming humans (in this case the decision of the crowd was never binding of course... :wink:).

View file

@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ The CoMe pad is not subject to the [core documents](documents.md) which means th
- a moment of silence
- to focus the attention
- a brief [check-in round](https://medium.com/range/check-in-rounds-a7737012fed5)
- to have hear everyone's voice and be able to understand their current mode
- to have heard everyone's voice and be able to understand their current mode
- finding volunteers for the imminent meeting tasks
- meaning someone to take notes, someone to update the physical board, and someone for the digital calendar
- the volunteer to clear all [reservation sheets](/practicalities/roomreservation.md) after the meeting is also found now
- the volunteer to clear all [weekly reservation sheets](/practicalities/roomreservation.md) after the meeting is also found now
- an overview of resources used in the last week (e.g. water and electricity)
- to give people a feeling of how much we as a group consume
- the format has been changed many times and is still not satisfying
@ -59,4 +59,6 @@ The CoMe pad is not subject to the [core documents](documents.md) which means th
- an selection of subjectively interesting world news
- a tiny version of [Tekmíl](https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/tekosina-anarsist-tekmil-a-tool-for-collective-reflection) or a space for potentially critical feedback to others present
- a to-do list for fixes and improvements around the house
- handing out responsibilities (like answering the phone or mails) for the whole week
- a list of who is actively hosting whom
- probably more that got forgotten over time...

View file

@ -8,26 +8,28 @@ There are 3 positions at Kanthaus, in ascending level of responsibility *and* po
===
## Evaluation
Everyone at Kanthaus gets evaluated—it's normal! Evaluation is a formal opportunity for you and the rest of the Kanthaus community to honestly inspect how that relationship is going and which Position suits you at this time: the whole thing lasts for ~1 hour. This document is a more human-readable version of the formal agreements located in the [Constitution](https://kanthaus.online/governance/constitution).
Everyone at Kanthaus gets evaluated—it's normal! Evaluation is a formal opportunity for you and the rest of the Kanthaus community to honestly inspect how that relationship is going and which Position suits you at this time: the whole thing lasts for ~1,5 hours. This document is a more human-readable version of the formal agreements located in the [Constitution](https://kanthaus.online/governance/constitution).
### 1. Meeting with Kanthaus Volunteers and Members (~30 minutes)
When it is time for your evaluation, a meeting will be arranged with you in which only you and existing Kanthaus Members and Volunteers are invited. This will probably be done during a Coordination Meeting. No official notes will be taken, although you are welcome to take notes if you wish. The only question that needs to be answered is whether you want to apply to continue at your current Position (e.g. Visitor) or progress to the next Position (e.g. Volunteer); aside from that the discussion is open and you are warmly invited to ask anything you want an answer to. Questions to consider include—
### 1. Meeting with Kanthaus Volunteers and Members (~75 minutes)
When it is time for your evaluation, a meeting will be arranged with you in which you and existing Kanthaus Members and Volunteers are invited. This will probably be done during a Coordination Meeting. No official notes will be taken, although you are welcome to take notes if you want, and an informal summary will be shared with the other Volunteers and Members afterwards. The only question that needs to be answered is whether you want to apply to continue at your current Position (e.g. Visitor) or progress to the next Position (e.g. Volunteer); aside from that the discussion is open and you are warmly invited to ask anything you want an answer to. Questions to consider include—
- What project-work are you doing for Kanthaus, Wurzen or elsewhere?
- Where do you see your role in Kanthaus?
- What do you see as your strengths/allowable weaknesses?
- What have you enjoyed/disliked about your time so far?
- How do you prefer to receive critical feedback?
- Do you have any outstanding conflicts with people involved at Kanthaus?
- What project-work do you imagine doing for Kanthaus, Wurzen or elsewhere?
- What do you see as your strengths/allowable weaknesses?
- Do you have allergies, dietary requirements or medical conditions you want to tell us about?
- What are your plans for the future?
### 2. Kanthaus Members and Volunteers meet privately (~20 minutes)
### 2. Kanthaus Members and Volunteers meet privately (~15 minutes)
After meeting with you, the Kanthaus Members and Volunteers will meet without you to decide which Position they find appropriate for you at this time. This meeting has three stages—
**2.1. 'Mock' vote**
Before any discussion takes place, the question will be asked, _"Do you support, accept or oppose (your name) becoming/remaining as a (Position you apllied for) at this point in time?"_ The participants will vote anonymously vote and see the predictive result.
Before any discussion takes place, the question will be asked, _"Do you support, accept or oppose (your name) becoming/remaining as a (Position you apllied for) at this point in time?"_ The participants will vote anonymously and see the predictive result.
**2.2. Discussion**
The participants will talk personally about the result and any personal opinions they have. There is no particular format, but the discussion typically starts with a round, followed by open discussion and closes with a round.
The participants will talk personally about the result and any personal opinions they have. There is no particular format.
**2.3. Vote**
Again the question will be asked, _"Do you support, accept or oppose (your name) becoming/remaining as a (Position you applied for) at this point in time?"_ and again the participants will vote anonymously. A successful outcome occurs when there are 3 or more times as many support votes to oppose votes (e.g. 4 'support', 2 'accept' and 1 'oppose'.) If unsuccessful, the procedure will be repeated at the lower position, for example: if you requested to become Volunteer and it was unsuccessful, the process would be repeated as if you'd applied to remain as a Visitor. Only the result of the vote, not the individual votes, are recorded.